↑
Menu

Harvard Classics Journey • Volume 22 of 51

How Does a Stranger Become Home?

Homer, The Odyssey

Opening: home begins without the hero

Alex: The Odyssey does not open with Odysseus telling his own adventures. It opens in Ithaca, where Penelope and Telemachus live with suitors consuming the household’s food and pressing for a decision about marriage. Volume XXII prints S. H. Butcher and Andrew Lang’s prose translation. What does that opening change?

Peter: The home is not an empty prize waiting for him. People have been trying to preserve it.

Gwen: Penelope has endured pressure and uncertainty. Telemachus has had to grow into a public role without knowing whether his father lives.

Eric: And the suitors are guests who refuse the limits of guesthood. Hospitality, a rule meant to protect strangers, can be exploited by those who will not leave.

Alex: The poem will ask how a traveler survives among strangers and how a household recognizes him when he returns.

The guest who is not yet known

Peter: In the Phaeacian episode, Odysseus arrives as a stranger before he reveals his name. Nausicaa and then the royal household give him aid. This is hospitality at its best: help does not wait for a résumé.

Eric: Yet hosts and guests make themselves vulnerable. The suitors demonstrate the other side of the rule in Ithaca, where those received into a home turn their welcome into occupation.

Gwen: That contrast prevents us from saying only “be kind to strangers.” The poem asks what obligations make welcome sustainable—care from the host and restraint from the guest.

Alex: In Book 9, Odysseus tells the Phaeacians about Polyphemus. The Cyclops eats his guests and mocks the norms of hospitality. Odysseus answers with the false name “Nobody,” which lets him escape when the blinded Cyclops calls to his neighbors.

Peter: The false name saves lives. But Odysseus then shouts his real name from the ship, and Polyphemus calls on Poseidon to avenge him. The man clever enough to hide his identity cannot resist claiming credit.

Eric: That moment joins ingenuity to pride. The escape was skillful; the boast exposes the crew to further danger. A heroic story told by the hero himself can include evidence against the hero’s judgment.

The name that would have doomed Odysseus in the cave becomes the name he cannot bear to keep hidden at sea.

Recognition is shared knowledge

Alex: On Ithaca, Odysseus remains disguised. In Book 19, the old nurse Eurycleia recognizes a scar while washing him. He stops her from speaking. Why delay a truth she already knows?

Peter: He needs to deal with the suitors without warning them. Concealment is a tactic for surviving in his own house.

Gwen: But it also means other people must carry the burden of his secrecy. Eurycleia’s memory and loyalty matter to the success of the plan; she is not just a convenient witness.

Eric: The scar is a physical mark of identity, yet the poem pauses to tell its earlier story. Even an apparently undeniable sign has meaning because someone remembers how it came to be.

Alex: Penelope’s recognition in Book 23 is different. After the suitors have been killed, she does not accept the mere announcement that Odysseus has returned. She orders that their bed be moved. Odysseus knows it cannot be moved intact because he built it around a living olive tree.

Peter: That is a test no impostor should pass. She needs evidence before she can risk believing him.

Gwen: It is also knowledge they share as a couple. The bed’s rootedness is a beautiful image of a home made together, though the years apart have made proof necessary.

Eric: We should be wary of saying Penelope’s hesitation is a failure of trust. Odysseus himself has survived by lies and disguises; the poem gives her strong reason to test appearances. Recognition is a mutual act, not a demand that she surrender judgment to his claim.

What the homecoming costs

Peter: The killing of the suitors in Book 22 can look like the restoration of the household. They abused hospitality, threatened Telemachus, and tried to take what was not theirs.

Gwen: The scene also includes the killing of servants judged disloyal. Their choices happened inside a house controlled for years by men who held power over them. We cannot simply assume their freedom to act matched Odysseus’ freedom.

Eric: The poem distinguishes among figures—some are spared, others are not—but the violence still presses a question: what can a returning master know about the conditions under which others lived during his absence?

Alex: Book 24 makes the problem public. The suitors have families, and their deaths threaten another cycle of retaliation. Athena’s intervention imposes peace. If “homecoming” ended only at the bedroom door, we would miss the community that must live after the revenge.

Peter: Does divine peace solve the injustice?

Alex: It stops the cycle in the poem. Whether it resolves every moral question raised by the slaughter is another matter. A formal ending can be necessary and still leave readers to judge how restoration was achieved.

Pulling the threads together

Gwen: Penelope’s work and test change the meaning of Odysseus’ return. He does not simply possess home because he once lived there. He has to be recognized by someone who has carried it through his absence.

Eric: The hospitality scenes likewise show that welcome and restraint depend on each other. Odysseus is both a vulnerable stranger and a returning master who judges others.

Peter: And his name is both something to hide for safety and something he needs others to know. He mishandles that tension at Polyphemus’ cave; Penelope handles it more carefully at home.

Alex: The poem makes belonging more demanding than arrival. It asks whether a household and a community can recognize the returning person without forgetting the people who waited, worked, and died while he was gone.

Questions to Carry Forward

  • What do the Phaeacians and the Ithacan suitors teach about the duties of host and guest?
  • Why does Odysseus reveal his name to Polyphemus after successfully escaping as “Nobody”?
  • What different kinds of knowledge do Eurycleia’s scar and Penelope’s bed test provide?
  • Whose choices are hardest to judge fairly in the punishment of the household servants?
  • Why does the poem need a public peace after the private reunion?

Reading note: Harvard Classics Volume XXII prints the Butcher–Lang prose translation of the Odyssey. References above are to Books 6–9, 19, and 22–24. The dialogue paraphrases its scenes rather than quoting the translation, and it treats questions about household power as interpretive questions rather than claims the poem settles explicitly.